I thought I would just quickly bump this topic in the interest of having a Council member sponsor this proposal. The current SIP procedures note that proposals should be discussed for a minimum of five days post-temp check. We’re 20 days in now, and the temp check for this proposal is currently sitting at around 40% more supporting votes than the next most supported SIP.
Is there anything that this proposal is missing that is preventing it from being in a state that is worth sponsoring? I am not unwilling to make revisions if necessary, but there is pretty clearly community support on this proposal as-is given the temp check results.
Either way, would love to see some acknowledgement from SRL of this SIP (and the above discussion) to help push this through or make the necessary changes.